Get Outrgaed

Understanding the root of moral conflicts is essential for maintaining social cohesion. Kurt Gray reveals that our deepest disagreements stem not from hatred or ignorance, but from different perceptions of harm and who needs protection. This insight provides a practical pathway to meaningful dialogue across political and moral divides.

Core Principles

The Harm Foundation

All moral beliefs, regardless of political orientation, are rooted in protecting against perceived harm. Conservatives and liberals don’t differ in their desire to prevent harm — they differ in their views of who is being harmed and what constitutes harm. Understanding this shared foundation creates opportunities for connection.

Moral Validation

Acknowledging others’ genuine concern about harm doesn’t require agreeing with their conclusions. When we validate someone’s moral perceptions as sincere attempts to protect against harm, we create space for real dialogue. This validation helps decrease dehumanization and enables more productive conversations.

Story Over Statistics

Personal narratives about harm are more effective than facts and figures in building understanding. Stories help us see the human impact behind moral positions and create emotional connections that statistics cannot match. They make abstract moral principles concrete and relatable.

Try It Now

1. Start your next difficult conversation by asking about a personal experience that shaped the other person’s views
2. When someone expresses a opposing viewpoint, respond first by acknowledging their concern for preventing harm
3. Share a personal story about why you care about an issue before presenting your argument
4. Find someone with opposing views and ask them to explain who they’re trying to protect and why

07/23/25